MATH383: Dynamical system linearization,
period-doubling, chaotic behavior
Overview
Local linearization, eigenvalue evolution maps
Forced systems, period doubling
Chaotic behavior, implications for nonlinear systems: weather
prediction, economic forecasts
Local linearization
Behavior of solutions of nonlinear system
can be approximated locally by
In the vicinity of each point ,
eigenvalues
of
indicate localized behavior:
periodic orbits
attractor
for all
repeller
for all
saddle points
of differing signs
Forced systems
Consider now behavior of solutions of forced nonlinear system
Local linearization is
The behavior now depends on how each possible behavior is
influenced by the force .
As in the unforced case, In the vicinity of each point ,
eigenvalues
of
indicate localized behavior, but can now be modified by
periodic orbits ,
modified by the periods of :
resonance, period doubling
attractor
for all ,
modified by :
reinforce, counteract dissipation
repeller
for all ,
modified by :
system stabilization
saddle points
of differing signs, modified by :
maintain unstable system equilibrium
See Homework12 solution for numerical experiments showing the
above behaviors
Chaotic behavior
Systems can exhibit complex behavior when periods in the forcing
and those intrinsic to the system are incomensurable
Such behavior is recognized by complex Poincare sections,
typically fractal, i.e., of non-integer dimension, and is termed
“chaotic”
Chaotic behavior arises surprisingly often, and is considered to
be generic (i.e., expected), in the sense that a forced,
nonlinear system will typically show chaotic behavior for some
choice of system parameters
Famous example: Lorenz system for weather prediction
If the flap of a butterfly's wings can be
instrumental in generating a tornado, it can equally well
be instrumental in preventing a tornado. (E. Lorenz,
1972)
Further study: Dynamical systems, Ergodic Theory (MATH590,
MATH897)